Thursday, September 28, 2017
Wednesday, September 20, 2017
Edge of Darkness has a couple of flaws, the first of which is that the story feels drawn out unnecessarily. The second is in the way that the movie portrays a stereotypical evil corporate defense contractor, which is completely unrealistic, and even has a slight James Bond villain feel to it. But despite the film's flaws, the last 20 minutes deliver in a big way. Mel Gibson shines as a cop out for revenge for the murder of his daughter. It is hard to imagine anyone else playing the role with the same kind of intensity.
As the story goes, Detective Thomas Craven (Gibson) witnesses his daughter's murder, and becomes obsessed with finding the killer. The trail leads him to her place of work, which is a corporate military contractor that is up to some shenanigans. It seems that his daughter was going to blow the whistle on the company.
There are a few scenes where Craven imagines talking to his dead daughter, as if he might be losing his mind. This turns into a key plot point, and is important to the final scene of the movie, which at first I found emotionally moving. However, afterwards, I felt like the final scene was a little corny.
When I saw the actor Danny Huston, I recognized him from the cable series Magic City. In that series he plays a gangster, who is as close to the human equivalent of the devil that a human can get. In Edge of Darkness he is just the evil head of a corporation, and unlike his television counterpart, he at times shows that he has human weaknesses. His presence in the movie, along with the intense performance by Mel Gibson, uplifts the film and saves it from a negative review.
There was a time when Mel Gibson would play in top grossing films and command top salary, but he made some personal mistakes, and Hollywood is not that forgiving. Here he is playing in what is essentially a B movie. It is a second tier film that just barely manages to be good enough to make it worth watching.
Rating: * * *
Edge of Darkness has a 56% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. My favorite movie critic, Richard Roeper, gives it three stars. The late Roger Ebert gave it two and a half stars.
Posted by John Coffey at 11:26 AM
Tuesday, September 19, 2017
There is likely a connection with the lightsaber to all the scenes in the forceback, but we can't really discern Rey's parentage from that. I think that it is highly likely that Rey is a Skywalker for 3 reasons: 1. Star Wars is the story of Skywalkers. 2. Who is Luke talking to in the first The Force Awakens teaser trailer when he says "The Force is strong in my family, my father has it, I have it, my sister has it, you have that power too"? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCc2v7izk8w) 3. Near the the release date of The Force Awakens there was an officially commissioned painting of Rey that had the caption "Rey Skywalker", which maybe later was changed. BTW, on the day of the release of The Force Awakens, the wikipedia page referred to her as "Rey Skywalker", but "Skywalker" was removed the next day. Did they know something we didn't, or were they just guessing?
P.S. Marina Sirtus on Star Trek The Next Generation: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xjW-Gvi0NXk
Posted by John Coffey at 8:45 PM