The opening sequence practically endorses slavery, which I find almost unforgivable. The question is should I blame the movie or blame the book? I have an expectation that any movie based upon a book should be somewhat true to the book that it represents, so I partially blame the book. It is like asking if "Das Boat" is pro-Nazi? But I find it questionable that someone chose to make a movie based off of a book that has a sympathetic view toward slavery. The slaves portrayed in this movie are happier than they should be and incapable of independent existence.
I think that the people who saw this movie in 1939 weren't interested in the pro-slavery aspects of the film. Gone With the Wind was a very popular romance novel. People wanted to see the book/soap opera on the big screen.
A person could view this movie as an historical account, even if that history is not totally accurate.
Gone With the Wind is about the turbulent romance between the rogue Rhett Butler and the manipulative Scarlet O'Hara during the Civil War and Reconstruction. It is not just just a movie. It is an event. At almost 4 hours in length, it takes some patience to get through. The last hour and a half is nothing but a soap opera, and the rest of the movie is heavy in soap opera elements. I would have been pleased if the movie had ended an hour early with Rhett Butler and Scarlet O'Hara married and living happily ever after. However, the movie is not content to let its characters be happy. They must be in constant strife. Still, I thought that the ending, which I found somewhat moving, was worth waiting for.
This is an epic film with a fantastic musical score and great cinematography. Although the movie might be true to the novel, I think that it could have been more than just a romance picture. The best part is the first 2.5 hours that deals with historical events, so it is too bad that last hour seems almost pointless.