I had high expectations for Blade Runner 2049, the sequel to the 35 year old Blade Runner. The early reviews were great and it achieved an 89% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. I went out of my way to see the movie, but I am going to tell you now to save your money and either rent it, or wait for it to get to a discount theater. About half way through the film I was still waiting to find out what the point was, and about two thirds of the way through I concluded that it had no point. I thought that maybe we would get something stunning in the last act, but the plot is very thin. The movie instead chooses to impresses us with its visuals, none of which are that much different than the first film. In fact, many of the scenes are murky, with dusty desolate landscapes. There are also a couple of confusing plot points that didn't quite make sense to me.
The first movie had a definite point to it. If you could engineer biological beings close to human but not quite human, where do you draw the line between what is human and what is not? What has rights and what doesn't? What is real and what is not, which is the point of the original novel? In both films the 'replicants' are used as slaves and have no rights, but in the sequel there is hardly any difference between the replicants and the humans.
It makes little sense to me to have a future world that uses biological beings as slaves, because in the real world we are probably only 10 to 20 years away from having intelligent robots that could do any sort of labor.
The only point of Blade Runner 2049 is that replicants are planning to revolt, which presumably will take place in the next sequel. As such, it feels like half a movie because there is not that much story here, so there is plenty of room in the picture to include a revolt. I should also point out that a revolt by artificial beings is not that original; the TV show Dark Matter has a subplot about this, and we have seen it in Star Trek at least a couple of times, and it is the central point of both Battlestar Galactica TV series.
Blade Runner 2049 fails to capture the spirit that made the original Blade Runner magical. The main character, played by Ryan Gosling, displays mostly only one emotion, which is brooding.
There is enough eye candy and barely enough story to make the movie worth seeing, but I wouldn't want to spend $10 to see it. If you are willing to wait, you can spend a couple of bucks to rent it or catch it at a discount theater.
The film uses nudity to the point of overdoing it. Seeing 40 foot tall naked holograms on the street might make sense from a science fiction perspective, but it is just filler to distract us from the lack of a great story.
Rating: * * 3/4.
P.S. I conjecture that the movie is not called "Blade Runner 2048" because there is a popular smartphone game called "2048." Personally, I don't like any title that includes a date because it will quickly become obsolete, like "Space 1999", "Death Race 2000", and "2001: A Space Odyssey."