Thursday, October 29, 2015

Steve Jobs

The news article Basically, nobody went to see the new Steve Jobs movie seems prophetic because I was the only person in the theater watching the movie.  Anything about Apple, Steve Jobs and computer technology is interesting to me, which is why I was there.

This is an amazing biopic, but at first I couldn't figure out why I like the movie so much.   The film is about 98% conversation, almost all of which is people arguing with each other.   What makes the film interesting is that everything proceeds at a rapid pace, which means the audience is forced to pay attention to keep up.  When the film was done, I felt like I had just seen something wonderful, but I wasn't sure why.

I doubt that any of the conversations in this film took place exactly as depicted in the movie, but the conversations serve a purpose to convey a great deal of information about people and historical events.

The movie throws technical terms around that would go over the heads of most people, but for a computer hacker like me, this was gravy.  There is a certain joy in being able to understand all of this.

Really the movie is about relationships, specifically how Steve Jobs related to everyone else.   The way Steve Jobs related to everyone is to be a jerk, mostly by lashing out at people, but at the same time he seemed to draw everyone toward him with the power of his personality and his vision.   Steve Jobs seemed like a man who thought that he was so far above everybody else that he didn't need to take time to be nice to people, so the key is to realize that the only thing he only cared about was is make his vision a reality.  Had Steve Jobs been any different, would the world be a lesser place today?

Steve Jobs vision was always ahead of the technology of the day.   All the early computers his companies created were underpowered, lacking in memory, not very useful for anything productive, and way overpriced.  This is why the Macintosh and the NeXT computers were commercial failures.   It wasn't until Jobs returned to Apple in 1997 that the cost of technology had come down enough to make Jobs' vision a runaway commercial success.

This is one of the best movies of the year and nobody is watching it.   My advice is to see it before it disappears from the theaters.  I want to see it again.

Rating: * * * *

Steve Jobs has an 85% rating on Rotten Tomatoes.

Friday, October 2, 2015

The Searchers


In 1868, Ethan Edwards (John Wayne) returns home to Texas after fighting for the Confederacy in the Civil War.  Initially he is biased against his brother's adopted son, Martin Pawley (Jeffrey Hunter), because Martin is part Native American.  Ethan is unapologetically racists against the Comanches.  When members of his brother's family are killed or abducted by Comanches, he vows to track down his surviving relatives and bring them home.  When Edwards gets word that his young niece Debbie (Natalie Wood) is alive, he and Martin spend over a decade trying to find her.  Ethan eventually warms up to Martin, making him his heir, but when he does find a fully grown Debbie, she is integrated into the Native American way of life and does not want to return with Ethan and Martin.  As a result, Ethan feels that she has been corrupted by the Comanches and wants to kill her.  Fortunately, by the end of the movie, his hard heart softens.

It is hard to judge this 1956 movie from a 2015 perspective.  One Native American tribe is portrayed as murderous, although other Native American individuals are portrayed as friendly.  When the U.S. Army decides to attack the murderous tribe, they make it clear that their plan is to massacre everyone without any effort to spare the innocent, although the movie does show women and children escaping.  So it is hard to determine the intent of the movie.  Is it merely portraying racism that would have existed in 1868, or is it also reflecting racist attitudes that would have been common in 1956?  If the movie is an accurate portrayal of 1868, then it should be praised for showing us history and taking a stand against racism.  I think that this is mostly what the movie is trying to do, except one cannot help feel that that the portrayal of Native Americans is too stereotyped.  I think that even though the movie is clearly taking a stand against racism, it was limited by the time period in which is was made, because the film does not stray very far from traditional western movie ideas about Native Americans.  Maybe it had to be this way to be a commercial success.

I am not sure what to make of the fact that at least one key Native American character is portrayed by a white actor.

The Searchers is considered one of the greatest films ever made, and possibly John Wayne's best performance.  It is certainly considered one of the best westerns ever made.  However, its attitude toward Native Americans makes it feel a little dated.

Many critics praised the beautiful scenery in the film, which was filmed in Monument Valley in Arizona and Utah.  Having lived in Utah, I wasn't quite as impressed.  Most of these areas looked far too inhospitable for people to actually be living there, so the scenery wasn't an accurate reflection of the high plains of Texas where the story takes place.


Rating:  * * * .5